Below is a letter that I wrote on behalf of the Southeastern Brookhaven Democratic Club, which is the organization in which I will soon be president. The letter is in response to Governor Cuomo’s proposed education cuts in the 2011-2012 Executive Budget.
*****
The Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo
Governor of New York State
New York State Capitol Building
Albany, New York 12224
March 16, 2011
Dear Governor,
We believe that the primary mission of a responsible government in this economic climate is to craft a strategy for balancing the budget while simultaneously protecting our most vital services and our most vulnerable citizens. A review of the 2011-2012 Executive Budget has resulted in some serious concerns regarding the manner in which you have chosen to address the State’s budget deficit. Primarily, we are extremely concerned about the extent to which the burden of sacrifice has been placed upon the education system. One of the defining characteristics of the State of New York is our commitment to quality education. As important as we all agree it is to balance the budget we must be sure that we are not doing so at the expense of our most vulnerable citizens.
Balancing the budget on the backs of our children is shortsighted and misguided policy. Our children have only one opportunity to attain the quality education that they need to compete in the job market of the future. For them, the dramatic cuts you have proposed to their education are not temporary or short term sacrifices. The sacrifices they are being forced to make will have lasting ramifications for the rest of their lives. By eroding the quality of our schools we are, in effect, setting up the next generation of New Yorkers to be replaced by out of state workers who are better educated than they are. The very kind of outsourcing we have castigated when American jobs are shipped overseas is exactly what we will see years from now in New York when our children are less qualified for jobs than their out of state counterparts.
We must ask ourselves who we are as New Yorkers. New Yorkers are regarded as highly competitive, well educated, and trend setting. This did not happen by accident. This perception is the direct result of the commitment to fundamental values that have always guided our decisions in New York. With the statistics already showing that our students have fallen far behind students in other countries this is a time to be investing in our education systems not plundering them for financial gain. Our children simply cannot afford the cuts that are being proposed.
We are not blind to the fact that there are flaws in our education system. There is no doubt that waste exists, and there is clearly room for reform but that reform needs to be based upon a strategic evaluation of the entire structure to identify wasteful practices and non-essential areas first. Applying a uniform budget reduction across the entire education system demonstrates a lack of appreciation for the consequences of that action. It seems to be conventional wisdom that, due to the high costs, education is a popular target for spending cuts. These days it seems that government prefers to choose the easiest targets rather than to take the time to identify areas of the budget that could afford significant reductions without sacrificing our most essential services or our most vulnerable citizens. The uniform 10% budget reduction proposed across the board in the education budget is the financial equivalent of performing brain surgery with a hatchet instead of a scalpel.
As a political organization on Long Island we must also point out that there are education issues unique to our region of the State that have been evaded by State government for years. The formula used to allocate education funds to the various regions of the State results in Long Island contributing far more in tax revenues to the State than the region receives in State aid. Taxpayers in our region are seeing their money used to finance school districts in Upstate New York while their own districts are struggling to make ends meet. Now, as a result of your budget and the perceived affluence of our communities, Long Island will also receive a higher reduction in State aid than other regions which will further complicate the budget crisis faced by our schools in this difficult economy. You have often spoken of shared sacrifice with regard to your budget, but these sacrifices are far from equitable.
In light of the obvious need for reductions in State spending it seems that it is time to look at areas outside of tax generated revenue where funds can be located and redirected to compensate for the reduction in State aid for education. The New York State Lottery from its inception has promoted itself as a source of money for education. The average citizen believes that the balances of the funds collected from the Lottery that do not go directly to the winner are then allocated for education. According to research performed by the New York State Assembly in 2006 only 32% of the funds collected by the Lottery go toward education with an additional 12% going toward operating expenses (56% is disbursed to prize winners). Although we cannot presume to know just how much money could be reallocated from this 12% it seems a reasonable place to begin the search for waste and inefficiency. Funds that could be directed to schools could begin to fill the void left by the budget cuts in State aid.
As a consequence of the budget cuts proposed to education there would be a statistically significant increase in the number of teachers collecting unemployment benefits from the State. It does not appear from the documents we have reviewed that this increase has been included in the savings calculations provided by your office. We strongly suggest researching the overall budget impact of this increase in benefits on the projected savings. New York taxpayers, given the choice, would much prefer that their hard earned money go toward paying the salary or benefits of a teacher in the classroom rather than the unemployment benefits of one who is forced to sit at home while they look for a job. We believe that it is the obligation of a responsible government to do everything possible to keep quality teachers in their jobs.
Finally, your budget places an enormous focus on student achievement as a measure of teacher performance. Although there is undoubtedly a place for this in the formula, it cannot be the only measure used. There are many other components that contribute to student performance not the least of which being the degree of parental engagement in the education process. Students who lack parental support will perform more poorly than students with strong support regardless of the talents of their teacher. By making schools compete for funding based upon student performance you are holding schools hostage to circumstances which in some cases may be out of their control.
As the father of three beautiful daughters you must look at this issue through the eyes of a parent. Our children need to work harder than ever before to compete in the future. Advances in technology have made their world smaller than ever and have placed them at the negotiating table with children from around the world. As parents, we owe it to our children to invest in their future by committing to their education. The return on this investment will determine the economic climate of their future, and the extent of their opportunities.
We welcome the opportunity to discuss our mutual commitment to education with you.
Sincerely,